COLORADO EDITORIAL FORUM
By Emilie C. Ailts and Vicki Cowart
As national health care reform faces its next hurdle -- a conference committee bill that reconciles the House and Senate bills -- we believe it's critical to draw attention to a provision contained in the House bill. This provision, brought by Reps. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) and Joe Pitts (R-Pa.) and known as the Stupak abortion coverage ban, would create barriers to women's reproductive health care far worse than any encountered since the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision legalizing abortion.
This new abortion coverage ban makes insurance coverage for abortion virtually unavailable for millions of women purchasing insurance plans through the newly created health insurance exchange.
Federal law already bans use of federal funds for abortions, but the Stupak measure goes much further. It denies use of private money -- not just public money -- to cover abortions.
Click here to view full op-ed
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Gaaaagh, these "op eds" on this site SUCK!
Who is behind this phony outfit, American Forum?
Something is really fake and fishy about this operation, itts main page does not have any hint of WHO ACTUALLY WORKS THERE, what the agenda is, and where the money is coming from. worst of all -- Everyting that gets published at this ugly blog and on the "editorial form' pages is DUMB AND IRRELEVANT AND LAME! Are there not other nonprofit groups who can use funding for their WORTHY programs?
This "American
Forum" outfit is obviously a big fat Meal Ticket for someone who cannot get legit work.....
Post a Comment